How Failure-to-Warn Lawsuits Work in Tennessee

How Failure-to-Warn Lawsuits Work in Tennessee

A failure-to-warn lawsuit says a company sold something dangerous without telling you the danger, and that missing warning led to your injury. In Tennessee, it is a type of product liability claim. To win, you generally have to show the product carried a risk the maker knew or should have known about, the maker did not give an adequate warning, and that gap caused real harm. If you can show those things, you can seek money for medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, and more.

These claims cover far more than one product. Drugs, medical devices, industrial chemicals, power tools, cleaning products, and vehicles have all been the subject of a failure-to-warn lawsuit. The common thread is simple: people got hurt by a risk they were never told about.

What Counts as a Failure to Warn in Tennessee?

Tennessee product liability claims fall into three main buckets, spelled out in the Tennessee Products Liability Act of 1978 (Tennessee Code Section 29-28-101 and following):

  • Manufacturing defect: the item was built wrong and left the factory more dangerous than intended.
  • Design defect: the product’s design itself is unsafe, even when made correctly.
  • Failure to warn (a labeling defect): the product needed a warning or instruction to be used safely, and the maker did not provide one.

A failure-to-warn claim focuses on that third bucket. Makers have a duty to warn about dangers that are not obvious and that they can reasonably foresee. If a hazard is already plain to any ordinary user, no warning may be required. The claim gets strong when the danger is hidden, the company knew about it, and a clear warning would have changed what you or your doctor did.

What Do You Have to Prove?

Tennessee courts look at whether the product was “unreasonably dangerous” when it left the maker’s control. Two tests can apply:

  • Consumer expectation test: was the product more dangerous than an ordinary buyer would expect?
  • Risk-utility test: would a reasonable maker have sold it in that condition, knowing the risk?

For a failure-to-warn case specifically, you generally need to show three things:

  • The product had a risk the maker knew or should have known about
  • The maker failed to give an adequate warning or instruction
  • That missing warning was a cause of your injury

Causation is where these cases are won or lost. It is not enough that a warning was missing. You have to connect the missing warning to what happened to you.

The Learned Intermediary Rule for Drugs and Devices

Prescription drug and device cases have a wrinkle. Under the learned intermediary rule, a drug maker usually meets its duty to warn by warning your doctor, not you directly. Tennessee follows this rule (see Pittman v. Upjohn Co., 890 S.W.2d 425 (Tenn. 1994)).

That does not let a company off the hook. The warning to the doctor still has to be adequate. If a maker hid a known risk from the medical community, or buried it, plaintiffs argue the maker never gave the doctor the information needed to protect the patient. That is a central theme in current drug cases, including the Dupixent lawsuits over a possible link to a rare lymphoma.

Does FDA Approval Block a Failure-to-Warn Claim?

Not by itself. In Tennessee, if a product met the safety standards of a government agency like the FDA at the time it was sold, the law gives the maker a rebuttable presumption that the product was not unreasonably dangerous (Tennessee Code Section 29-28-104).

“Rebuttable” is the key word. A presumption is a starting point, not a shield. Evidence that a company hid data from regulators, downplayed known risks, or kept marketing after warning signs appeared can overcome it. Compliance also does not automatically bar punitive damages when a company acted with reckless disregard for safety.

Who Can Be Held Liable?

A failure-to-warn lawsuit can name more than one company in the chain that put the product in your hands:

  • The manufacturer that made the product
  • A parent company or component maker in some cases
  • Distributors and, in certain situations, sellers

Under Tennessee’s comparative fault system, more than one party can share responsibility, and the court assigns a percentage of fault to each. You can recover as long as your own share of fault is less than 50 percent, and your award is reduced by your percentage.

How Long Do You Have to File in Tennessee?

Tennessee gives you one year to file a personal injury or wrongful death claim (Tennessee Code Section 28-3-104). The clock usually starts when you knew, or reasonably should have known, that a product caused your injury.

Product cases also have a longer outer deadline called a statute of repose (Tennessee Code Section 29-28-103). In general, the action must be brought within six years of the injury, and in any event within ten years from when the product was first bought, or one year after the product’s expected life ends, whichever comes first.

These rules are strict, so an early case review protects your options.

FAQs

What is the difference between a design defect and a failure to warn?

A design defect means the product is unsafe as designed. A failure to warn means the design may be usable, but the maker did not tell users about a real risk or how to avoid it.

Do I need the actual product to file a claim?

It helps a lot. Keeping the product, its packaging, the label, and any receipts preserves evidence. If the item is gone, a lawyer can still investigate through records and testing.

Can I sue if there was a recall?

Often, yes. A recall can support your claim, but it does not replace it. You can still pursue compensation for injuries the product already caused.

What damages can I recover?

Medical bills and lost income (with no cap), plus pain and suffering (capped at $750,000, or $1 million for catastrophic injuries), and punitive damages in serious cases.

Never Warned About a Product That Hurt You?

If a product hurt you and you were never warned about the danger, the missing warning may be the heart of your case. These claims turn on records, testing, and deadlines, so time matters.

The Higgins Firm handles product injury and failure-to-warn claims for people across Tennessee, from Nashville to Memphis. Reach us through our contact page for a free case review. You pay nothing unless we recover money for you.

Author Bio

Jim Higgins, founder of the Higgins Firm, is a seasoned personal injury attorney with deep roots in Nashville, Tennessee. A 4th generation Nashvillian, Jim carries on the legal legacy of his father, a judge for over 30 years. After graduating from the University of Memphis School of Law, Jim’s career began on the other side of the courtroom, defending insurance companies and learning their tactics for minimizing settlements. However, he soon realized his true calling was fighting for the rights of the injured, and for the past several years, he has exclusively represented plaintiffs in personal injury cases.

Since then, his dedication and skill have earned him membership in the prestigious Million Dollar Advocates Forum, an organization limited to attorneys who have secured million and multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements for their clients. Licensed to practice in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Georgia, Jim focuses on personal injury, product liability, medical malpractice, and workers’ compensation cases. His exceptional work has been recognized by his peers, earning him a spot on the Super Lawyers list from 2021 to 2024, a distinction awarded to only a select group of accomplished attorneys in each state.

Google | Linked In | Avvo | State Bar Association